logo
Science Portal
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.5662.produseast1
About MSF Science Portal
About
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Copyright © Médecins Sans Frontières
v2.1.5662.produseast1
Journal Article
|Review

Optimal anthropometric discharge criteria from treatment of wasting: meta-analysis of individual patient data from 34 studies

Bliznashka L, Chaudhary S, Rattigan SM, Isanaka S, Adah R, Ahmed T, Alam N, Alitanou R, Bahwere P, Bailey J, Barthorp H, Becquet R, Belchior-Bellino V, Beri A, Berthé F, Bhandari N, Bose A, Burza S, Casademont C, Cazes C, Chaturvedi A, Collins S, Coulibaly I, Cuneo CN, Dansereau E, Daures M, Diala U, Djibo A, Escruela M, Faal A, Griswold S, Guesdon B, Guindo O, Hien J, Hossain MI, Hug J, Iyengar S, Jasper P, John C, Kangas ST, Kornetsky K, Lambebo A, Legese L, Lelijveld N, Mahajan R, Manary M, Mohan S, Myatt M, Nabwera H, Nackers F, Nahar B, Olufemi A, Patwari A, Phelan K, Rocaspana M, Rogers B, Sadler K, Salpeteur C, Sonko B, Soofi S, Taneja S, Tripathy P, Wegner D
Download

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-based treatment of acute malnutrition saves lives, but recovered children remain at risk of relapse postdischarge. Strategies to reduce this risk may include modification of anthropometric discharge criteria.


OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of anthropometric indices to reduce postdischarge relapse risk.


METHODS

We searched PubMed from inception to June 2022. We included studies that enrolled children aged 0–59 mo successfully treated for severe or moderate acute malnutrition (SAM or MAM), assessed anthropometry at discharge, and had ≥1 follow-up assessment ≤6 mo postdischarge. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for anthropometric indices at discharge over multiple cutoffs were calculated using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Area under the pooled receiver operating curve (AUC) was estimated to measure diagnostic accuracy. “Pragmatic” cutoffs were defined as those maximizing AUC given both pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity ≥0.75. Primary outcomes were SAM relapse (SAM episode after successful SAM treatment: weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) < −3, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 11.5 cm and/or edema) and MAM relapse (MAM episode after successful MAM treatment: −3 ≤ WHZ < −2 or 11.5 cm ≤ MUAC < 12.5 cm). Exposures were WHZ, MUAC, and weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) at discharge.


RESULTS

We included 34 studies from 16 countries contributing 21,989 children. WHZ at discharge had a higher AUC in predicting lower SAM and MAM relapse risk than MUAC or WAZ at discharge. None of the cutoffs examined met the study definition of “pragmatic.” The closest “pragmatic” cutoffs suggested that WHZ cutoffs of −1.4 and −1.8 or MUAC of 12.6 and 12.7 cm had the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting lower SAM and MAM relapse risk.


CONCLUSION

Relapse risk is high after successful MAM/SAM treatment. Future research can consider optimization of anthropometric discharge criteria as a strategy to reduce postdischarge relapse risk, weighing the operational and financial tradeoffs associated with any modification.

Subject Area

diagnosticspediatricsmalnutrition

Languages

English
DOI
10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.09.010
Published Date
01 Dec 2025
PubMed ID
41338691
Journal
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume | Issue | Pages
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages 1658-1668
Dimensions Badge
Similar Content
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Optimal anthropometric discharge criteria from treatment of wasting: meta-analysis of individual patient data from 34 studies | Journal Article / Review | MSF Science Portal